wip

text/2_relwork.tex

@@ -1,13 +1,31 @@
-\section{Related Work}
+\chapter{Related Work}
+
+% py umschreiben auf how the new contributor thing works https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314472/what-are-the-exact-criteria-for-the-new-contributor-indicator-to-be-shown  ; change date = 2018-08-21T21:04:49.177
 
-%inculde template before writing
 %read template notes again and adjust 
-%maybe devide into background and related work seperatly
+
+\section{Background}
+
+%background
+% explain SO and SE in detail and how it works
+% meta pages
+% do communities differ from one to another? (features)
+% add pictures of typical stackoverflow question page
+
+\section{State of the Art}
+
+% write in aspect of new users
+% -> getting users on board (community guide lines)
+% -> incentives for new users via reputation (maybe batches (do research on that))
+%    -> gaming the system
+%    -> prevent 1 day flies
+%    -> keep new users engaged
 
 %paper links bekommen:
 %tutorial: Bernal et al. \cite{bernal2017interrupted}
 %You Can’t Stay Here: The Efficacy of Reddit’s 2015 Ban Examined Through Hate Speech \cite{chandrasekharan2017you}
 % -> reddit hate community ban: change = ban
+% -> todo
 
 
 %Tracing Community Genealogy: How New Communities Emerge from the Old \cite{tan2018tracing}
@@ -16,7 +34,7 @@
 % <- One-day flies on StackOverflow \cite{slag2015one}
 %    -> [1] Discovering Value from Community Activity on Focused Question Answering Sites: A Case Study of Stack Overflow \cite{anderson2012discovering}
 %       -> [23] Predicting the perceived quality of online mathematics contributions from users' reputations \cite{tausczik2011predicting} about mathoverflow and quality
-%          -> [4] Predictors of Answer Quality in Online Q&A Sites }cite{harper2008predictors} shows that open qa sites are better than paywall or expert sites
+%          -> [4] Predictors of Answer Quality in Online Q&A Sites cite{harper2008predictors} shows that open qa sites are better than paywall or expert sites
 %          -> todo done
 %       -> todo done
 %    -> contains generic refernces to boost ref count
@@ -29,19 +47,10 @@
 %    -> [3] Finding the Right Facts in the Crowd: Factoid Question Answering over Social Media \cite{bian2008finding}
 %No Country for Old Members: User Lifecycle and Linguistic Change in Online Communities \cite{danescu2013no}
 %Better When It Was Smaller? Community Content and Behavior After Massive Growth \cite{lin2017better}
+% -> breaching community norms (kraut 2012)
+% -> lowering content quality (Gorbatai 2011)
 %Eliciting New Wikipedia Users’ Interests via Automatically Mined Questionnaires: For a Warm Welcome, Not a Cold Start \cite{yazdanian2019eliciting}
-
-
-%background
-% explain SO and SE in detail and how it works
-% meta pages
-% do communities differ from one to another? (features)
-% add pictures of typical stackoverflow question page
-
-
-%related work
-
-
+% -> cold start recommender system problem for recommending newcommers arictles to read and get a feeling for how to write articles; similar to SO because new commers don't know the rules so well; familiarize newcommers with how things work on the site
 
 
 %literatur analyse todo