wip
This commit is contained in:
@@ -119,19 +119,24 @@ The onboarding process is a permanent challenge for online communities.
|
|||||||
% Steering user behavior with badges \cite{anderson2013steering} # all abount badges, steering users, motivation, user may put in non trivial amounts of work to achieve badges -> powerful incentives, badges used in multiple ways (steer users to ask/answer more questions, voting, etc.)
|
% Steering user behavior with badges \cite{anderson2013steering} # all abount badges, steering users, motivation, user may put in non trivial amounts of work to achieve badges -> powerful incentives, badges used in multiple ways (steer users to ask/answer more questions, voting, etc.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% other
|
|
||||||
% Discovering Value from Community Activity on Focused Question Answering Sites: A Case Study of Stack Overflow \cite{anderson2012discovering} accepted answer strongly depends on when answers arrive, considered not only the question and accepted answer but the set of answers to a question
|
% quality
|
||||||
% Predicting the perceived quality of online mathematics contributions from users' reputations \cite{tausczik2011predicting} about mathoverflow and quality
|
% Predicting the perceived quality of online mathematics contributions from users' reputations \cite{tausczik2011predicting} about mathoverflow and quality
|
||||||
% Predictors of Answer Quality in Online Q&A Sites cite{harper2008predictors} 1) shows that fee or expert sites are better than open qa sites (greater fee better answers), 2) big communty sites like Yahoo! Answers out perform sites which depend on experts (e.g. library refernce services) (higher answer diversity and responsiveness)
|
% Predictors of Answer Quality in Online Q&A Sites cite{harper2008predictors} 1) shows that fee or expert sites are better than open qa sites (greater fee better answers), 2) big communty sites like Yahoo! Answers out perform sites which depend on experts (e.g. library refernce services) (higher answer diversity and responsiveness)
|
||||||
% Quizz: Targeted Crowdsourcing with a Billion (Potential) Users \cite{ipeirotis2014quizz} many online comunities bysed on volutarty of users not paid workers
|
% Better When It Was Smaller? Community Content and Behavior After Massive Growth \cite{lin2017better}, defaulting of subreddit, quality remains high, dip in upvotes directly after defaulting but recover quickly and get even higher than before, complaints about low-quality content do not increase, language stays the same, however community clusters among fewer posts than before defaulting
|
||||||
|
% lowering content quality (Gorbatai 2011) %TODO read and add to list of notizen
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% other
|
||||||
|
% Discovering Value from Community Activity on Focused Question Answering Sites: A Case Study of Stack Overflow \cite{anderson2012discovering} accepted answer strongly depends on when answers arrive, considered not only the question and accepted answer but the set of answers to a question
|
||||||
|
% Quizz: Targeted Crowdsourcing with a Billion (Potential) Users \cite{ipeirotis2014quizz} many online comunities based on volutarty of users not paid workers
|
||||||
% Design Lessons from the Fastest Q&A Site in the West \cite{mamykina2011design} understanding SO success, 1) productive competition (gamification reputation), 2) founders were already experts on site the created (ensured success early on, founders involved in community not external), 3) meta page for discussion and voting on features (same mechanics as on SO page)
|
% Design Lessons from the Fastest Q&A Site in the West \cite{mamykina2011design} understanding SO success, 1) productive competition (gamification reputation), 2) founders were already experts on site the created (ensured success early on, founders involved in community not external), 3) meta page for discussion and voting on features (same mechanics as on SO page)
|
||||||
% How Do Programmers Ask and Answer Questions on the Web? \cite{treude2011programmers} qa sites very effective at code review and conceptual questions
|
% How Do Programmers Ask and Answer Questions on the Web? \cite{treude2011programmers} qa sites very effective at code review and conceptual questions
|
||||||
% The role of knowledge in software development \cite{robillard1999role} people have different areas of knowledge and expertise
|
% The role of knowledge in software development \cite{robillard1999role} people have different areas of knowledge and expertise
|
||||||
% Finding the Right Facts in the Crowd: Factoid Question Answering over Social Media \cite{bian2008finding}, about Yahoo! Answers, finding factual answers by using available data on user interaction
|
% Finding the Right Facts in the Crowd: Factoid Question Answering over Social Media \cite{bian2008finding}, about Yahoo! Answers, finding factual answers by using available data on user interaction
|
||||||
% No Country for Old Members: User Lifecycle and Linguistic Change in Online Communities \cite{danescu2013no}
|
% No Country for Old Members: User Lifecycle and Linguistic Change in Online Communities \cite{danescu2013no}
|
||||||
% Better When It Was Smaller? Community Content and Behavior After Massive Growth \cite{lin2017better}, defaulting of subreddit, quality remains high, dip in upvotes directly after defaulting but recover quickly and get even higher than before, complaints about low-quality content do not increase, language stays the same, however community clusters among fewer posts than before defaulting
|
|
||||||
% Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior \cite{nonnecke2006non} about lurking, many programmers do that probably, not even registering, lurking not a bad behavior but observing, lurkers are more introverted, passive behavior, less optimistic and positive than posters, prviously lurking was thought of free riding, not contributing, taking not giving to comunity, important for getting to know a community, better integration when joining
|
% Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior \cite{nonnecke2006non} about lurking, many programmers do that probably, not even registering, lurking not a bad behavior but observing, lurkers are more introverted, passive behavior, less optimistic and positive than posters, prviously lurking was thought of free riding, not contributing, taking not giving to comunity, important for getting to know a community, better integration when joining
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% A comprehensive survey and classification of approaches for community question answering \cite{srba2016comprehensive}, meta study on papers published between 2005 and 2014
|
% A comprehensive survey and classification of approaches for community question answering \cite{srba2016comprehensive}, meta study on papers published between 2005 and 2014
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user