wip
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
|
||||
\chapter{Methodology}
|
||||
|
||||
% sentiment calculation via vaderlib, write whole paragraph
|
||||
% data sets as xml from archive.org
|
||||
% sentiment calculation via vaderlib, write whole paragraph and explain, also add ref to paper \cite{hutto2014vader}
|
||||
% data sets as xml files from archive.org \cite{archivestackexchange}
|
||||
|
||||
%cleaning data
|
||||
% broken entries, missing user id
|
||||
% answers in html -> strip html and remove code sections, not contribution to sentiment
|
||||
% answers in html -> strip html and remove code sections, no contribution to sentiment
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% calc sentiment for answers
|
||||
|
||||
% about the change
|
||||
% https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314287/come-take-a-look-at-our-new-contributor-indicator?cb=1
|
||||
% https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314472/what-are-the-exact-criteria-for-the-new-contributor-indicator-to-be-shown ; change date = 2018-08-21T21:04:49.177
|
||||
% https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314287/come-take-a-look-at-our-new-contributor-indicator \cite{post2018come}
|
||||
% https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314472/what-are-the-exact-criteria-for-the-new-contributor-indicator-to-be-shown \cite{sonic2018what} ; change date = 2018-08-21T21:04:49.177
|
||||
% new user indicator visible for 1 week ...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
%interrupted time series
|
||||
% ref tutorial paper
|
||||
% ref tutorial paper \cite{bernal2017interrupted}
|
||||
% often used in medical fields to see if changes have an effect
|
||||
% used same tensors as describe in paper, show formula and how it works, 3 tensors describe tensors and what they capture
|
||||
% explain why i cose this model, captures the change, more complex model would capture more but also get more complicated, these 3 tensors are enough to see the impact
|
||||
% explain why i chose this model, captures the change, more complex model would capture more but also get more complicated, these 3 tensors are enough to see the impact
|
||||
% fitting every value not aggregated values, aggregated values would have different weights, weights are too far spread, contrary to paper where person years are more or less constant
|
||||
% single value fitting is better, no weight issues, as weights are taken care of via more values
|
||||
% if one month has more values than another then that month affects its more as more values are present
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user