126 lines
9.1 KiB
TeX
126 lines
9.1 KiB
TeX
\chapter{Related Work}
|
||
|
||
% py umschreiben auf how the new contributor thing works https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314472/what-are-the-exact-criteria-for-the-new-contributor-indicator-to-be-shown ; change date = 2018-08-21T21:04:49.177
|
||
|
||
%read template notes again and adjust
|
||
|
||
\section{Background}
|
||
|
||
% explain SO and SE in detail and how it works
|
||
% meta pages
|
||
% do communities differ from one to another? (features)
|
||
% add pictures of typical stackoverflow question page
|
||
%
|
||
% not only ``forum`` for fast q&a but also knowledge base
|
||
% public posts and therefore good search engine availibity eg. google
|
||
% so success: Design Lessons from the Fastest Q&A Site in the West \cite{mamykina2011design} understanding SO success
|
||
|
||
% change introduced mid august 2018
|
||
% write about that post
|
||
% include user question how exactly it works
|
||
|
||
\section{State of the Art}
|
||
|
||
%structure
|
||
%- various research on collaborative online communities, yahoo answers, stackoverflow/exchange, quora, wikipedia, ...
|
||
% - A comprehensive survey and classification of approaches for community question answering \cite{srba2016comprehensive} # good description of SO
|
||
% - Design Lessons from the Fastest Q&A Site in the West \cite{mamykina2011design} understanding SO success
|
||
%- onboarding problem e.g. wikipedia, stackexchange
|
||
% - getting users to stay and contribute to the site
|
||
% - One-day flies on StackOverflow \cite{slag2015one}
|
||
% - Eliciting New Wikipedia Users’ Interests via Automatically Mined Questionnaires: For a Warm Welcome, Not a Cold Start \cite{yazdanian2019eliciting}
|
||
% -> cold start recommender system problem for recommending newcommers arictles to read and get a feeling for how to write articles; similar to SO because new commers
|
||
% - incentives for new users via reputation (maybe batches (do research on that))
|
||
% - gaming the system: Building reputation in stackoverflow: an empirical investigation. \cite{bosu2013building} gaming the reputation system of SO
|
||
% - prevent 1 day flies & keep new users engaged: Analysis of the reputation system and user contributions on a question answering website: Stackoverflow \cite{movshovitz2013analysis} about the reputation system
|
||
% - badges
|
||
% - One Size Does Not Fit All: Badge Behavior in Q\&A Sites \cite{yanovsky2019one} # all about badges, steering users, motivation
|
||
% - On the Causal Effect of Badges \cite{kusmierczyk2018causal} # all abount badges, steering users, motivation
|
||
% - Steering user behavior with badges \cite{anderson2013steering} # all abount badges, steering users, motivation
|
||
% - newcomers socialization, experienced users as models/mentors, positive feedback to newcomers
|
||
% - Do organizational socialization tactics influence newcomer embeddedness and turnover? \cite{allen2006organizational} #newcommers to organizations
|
||
% - We Don't Do That Here: How Collaborative Editing with Mentors Improves Engagement in Social Q\&A Communities \cite{ford2018we} # mentoring newcomers questions (before posting), 1 month experiment
|
||
% - Stack Overflow Isn't Very Welcoming: It's Time for That to Change \cite{hanlon2019stack} # passt sehr gut in die story, effort to make site more welcoming
|
||
% - Welcome Wagon: Classifying Comments on Stack Overflow \cite{silge2019welcome} #all about comment, effort to make site more welcoming
|
||
%
|
||
%- quality:
|
||
% - Predictors of Answer Quality in Online Q&A Sites cite{harper2008predictors} shows that open qa sites are better than paywall or expert sites
|
||
% - Predicting the perceived quality of online mathematics contributions from users' reputations \cite{tausczik2011predicting} about mathoverflow and quality
|
||
%
|
||
%- quasi experiments
|
||
% - stackexchange change
|
||
% - You Can’t Stay Here: The Efficacy of Reddit’s 2015 Ban Examined Through Hate Speech \cite{chandrasekharan2017you}
|
||
% -> reddit hate community ban: change = ban
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
%reminder
|
||
% write in aspect of new users
|
||
% -> getting users on board (community guide lines)
|
||
% -> incentives for new users via reputation (maybe batches (do research on that))
|
||
% -> gaming the system
|
||
% -> prevent 1 day flies
|
||
% -> keep new users engaged
|
||
|
||
|
||
%paper links bekommen:
|
||
%tutorial: Bernal et al. \cite{bernal2017interrupted}
|
||
%You Can’t Stay Here: The Efficacy of Reddit’s 2015 Ban Examined Through Hate Speech \cite{chandrasekharan2017you}
|
||
% -> reddit hate community ban: change = ban
|
||
% -> todo
|
||
|
||
|
||
%literature
|
||
% Tracing Community Genealogy: How New Communities Emerge from the Old \cite{tan2018tracing}
|
||
% On the personality traits of stackoverflow users \cite{bazelli2013personality} analyzing personality traits
|
||
% -> gute vorlage http://softwareprocess.es/pubs/bazelli2013ICSMERA-Personality.pdf
|
||
% <- One-day flies on StackOverflow \cite{slag2015one}
|
||
% -> [1] Discovering Value from Community Activity on Focused Question Answering Sites: A Case Study of Stack Overflow \cite{anderson2012discovering}
|
||
% -> [23] Predicting the perceived quality of online mathematics contributions from users' reputations \cite{tausczik2011predicting} about mathoverflow and quality
|
||
% -> [4] Predictors of Answer Quality in Online Q&A Sites cite{harper2008predictors} shows that open qa sites are better than paywall or expert sites
|
||
% -> todo done
|
||
% -> todo done
|
||
% -> contains generic refernces to boost ref count
|
||
% -> [5] Building reputation in stackoverflow: an empirical investigation. \cite{bosu2013building} gaming the reputation system of SO
|
||
% -> [8] Analysis of the reputation system and user contributions on a question answering website: Stackoverflow \cite{movshovitz2013analysis} about the reputation system
|
||
% -> todo done
|
||
% -> [1] Design Lessons from the Fastest Q&A Site in the West \cite{mamykina2011design} understanding SO success
|
||
% -> [2] How Do Programmers Ask and Answer Questions on the Web? \cite{treude2011programmers}
|
||
% -> [10] The role of knowledge in software development \cite{robillard1999role} people have different areas of knowledge and expertise
|
||
% -> [3] Finding the Right Facts in the Crowd: Factoid Question Answering over Social Media \cite{bian2008finding}
|
||
% No Country for Old Members: User Lifecycle and Linguistic Change in Online Communities \cite{danescu2013no}
|
||
% Better When It Was Smaller? Community Content and Behavior After Massive Growth \cite{lin2017better}
|
||
% -> breaching community norms (kraut 2012)
|
||
% -> lowering content quality (Gorbatai 2011)
|
||
% Eliciting New Wikipedia Users’ Interests via Automatically Mined Questionnaires: For a Warm Welcome, Not a Cold Start \cite{yazdanian2019eliciting}
|
||
% -> cold start recommender system problem for recommending newcommers arictles to read and get a feeling for how to write articles; similar to SO because new commers don't know the rules so well; familiarize newcommers with how things work on the site
|
||
% Do organizational socialization tactics influence newcomer embeddedness and turnover? \cite{allen2006organizational} #newcommers to organizations
|
||
% -> todo
|
||
% We Don't Do That Here: How Collaborative Editing with Mentors Improves Engagement in Social Q\&A Communities \cite{ford2018we} # mentoring new commers questions (before posting), 1 month experiment
|
||
% -> todo
|
||
% -> Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior \cite{nonnecke2006non} about lurking, many programmers do that probably, not even registering
|
||
% -> Social Barriers Faced by Newcomers Placing Their First Contribution in Open Source Software Projects\cite{steinmacher2015social} onboarding in open source software projects, difficulties for newcomers
|
||
% -> Paradise Unplugged: Identifying Barriers for Female Participation on Stack Overflow \cite{ford2016paradise} gender gap, females only 5%, contribution barriers
|
||
% -> Gender, Representation and Online Participation: A Quantitative Study \cite{vasilescu2014gender} investigation on minorities (eg women), under representation
|
||
% Stack Overflow Isn't Very Welcoming: It's Time for That to Change \cite{hanlon2019stack} # passt sehr gut in die story, effort to make site more welcoming
|
||
% -> todo
|
||
% Welcome Wagon: Classifying Comments on Stack Overflow \cite{silge2019welcome} #all about comments, effort to make site more welcoming
|
||
% -> todo
|
||
% One Size Does Not Fit All: Badge Behavior in Q\&A Sites \cite{yanovsky2019one} # all abount badges, steering users, motivation
|
||
% -> todo
|
||
% -> Can gamification motivate voluntary contributions? The case of StackOverflow Q&A community \cite{cavusoglu2015can} stimulting users to contribute via badges
|
||
% -> SOCIAL STATUS AND BADGE DESIGN \cite{immorlica2015social} about badges and how they create status classes, badges for every user and individual badges
|
||
% -> Quantifying the impact of badges on user engagement in online Q&A communities \cite{li2012quantifying} maintain consistent engagement, gamification via badges
|
||
% On the Causal Effect of Badges \cite{kusmierczyk2018causal} # all abount badges, steering users, motivation
|
||
% -> todo
|
||
% Steering user behavior with badges \cite{anderson2013steering} # all abount badges, steering users, motivation
|
||
% -> todo
|
||
% A comprehensive survey and classification of approaches for community question answering \cite{srba2016comprehensive} # good description of SO
|
||
% -> todo
|
||
|
||
|
||
%literatur analyse todo
|
||
%paper lesen und sachen rausschreiben; keywords ...
|
||
%struktur neu machen
|
||
%schreiben
|